Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Fishing\s+for\s+FM\s+contacts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Fishing\s+for\s+FM\s+contacts\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Fishing for FM contacts (score: 1): Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich); Date: Tue Jul 22 15:49:20 2003; http://www.arrl.org/contests/announcements/rules-vhf.html 1.9.Only recognized FM simplex frequencies may be used, such as 144.90 to 145.00; 146.49, .55 and .58, and 147.42, .45, .48, .51, .54 and .57; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00146.html (7,039 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Fishing for FM contacts (score: 1): Author: w2fca@capital.net (Frank Ayers); Date: Tue Jul 22 16:42:34 2003; One would also think that frequencies such as 146.565 could be used - 1.9.1.Local-option simplex channels and frequencies adjacent to the above that do not violate the intent of the above rules, or t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00147.html (7,341 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Fishing for FM contacts (score: 1): Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich); Date: Tue Jul 22 17:28:41 2003; One would also think that frequencies such as 146.565 could be used - I would think so as well, especially if you're going to play with CU2QSO. I still think that 145.500 - 145.800 is the "perfect" s; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00148.html (7,197 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]