Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Fw\:\s+APRS\s+while\s+roving\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Fw\:\s+APRS\s+while\s+roving\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Fw: APRS while roving (score: 1): Author: "Mike McCarty" <kb8yhv@amsat.org>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:51:33 -0600; Ev, I understand what they were trying to do with the new rules for APRS as far as spotting for rovers on APRS to be used by multi-op stations, but you make a distinction between APRS on 144.39 and; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00075.html (7,786 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Fw: APRS while roving (score: 1): Author: "Christopher Burke" <chris@n9yh.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:18:36 -0600; No, HamIM has always been legal. The difference is normal APRS uses the Internet - I can go to findu.com during the contest to get your location to try to work you. Until now you couldn't use APRS t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00080.html (7,561 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Fw: APRS while roving (score: 1): Author: "Mike McCarty" <kb8yhv@amsat.org>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:02:54 -0600; You got all that from reading the rules? Somebody's going to have to send me the decoder ring... Ok, some people have already made the assumption that rovers can use "full blown APRS", i.e. the netw; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00086.html (8,194 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]