Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+HF\s+\+6\s+xcvrs\s+\&\s+Transverters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+HF\s+\+6\s+xcvrs\s+\&\s+Transverters\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] HF +6 xcvrs & Transverters (score: 1): Author: David Whaley <dwhaley@mc.net>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 11:29:00 -0500; <http://user.mc.net/%7Edwhaley>I have decided to run my VHF contest station with Transverters instead of 2 separate radios (756PROII 6m & IC-910H 2m/70c). I plan to acquire Elecraft transverters for; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-05/msg00084.html (6,894 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] HF +6 xcvrs & Transverters (score: 1): Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 16:31:46 -0500; Try to have more than 1 radio... There are many times where you are going to want to be able to be on more than 1 band at a time.. I would think the 2 meter radio should be a stand alone setup I thin; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-05/msg00086.html (8,162 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] HF +6 xcvrs & Transverters (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 22:08:34 -0500 (CDT); Yes, almost all of my contest QSO's start on 2m and we then go up or down according to what bands we have in common. Very rarely I'll work someone on 50, 222 or 432 first. I can't think of an instanc; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-05/msg00088.html (9,413 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] HF +6 xcvrs & Transverters (score: 1): Author: aa4zz@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 07:01:37 -0400; Is this a fixed or portable station? That greatly changes some of the tradeoffs in ease of set up vs. flexibility and performance. Paul <http://user.mc.net/%7Edwhaley>I have decided to run my VHF con; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-05/msg00089.html (8,350 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]