Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+ICOM\s+756\s+Pro\s+III\s+for\s+six\s+meters\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+ICOM\s+756\s+Pro\s+III\s+for\s+six\s+meters\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Icom 756 Pro III for six meters? (score: 1): Author: "Les Rayburn" <les@highnoonfilm.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:41:21 -0500; I'm wondering if anyone on the list has any experience using the Icom 756 Pro III on 6 Meters? I'm interested in hearing about it's performance from the point of view of a VHF DX'er. Also, how useful; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00009.html (7,153 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 756 Pro III for six meters? (score: 1): Author: Fred Lass <felasstic@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:28:52 -0700 (PDT); We have used a 756 PRO III at W2SZ for several years. It has a great receiver. The band scope works fine on 6. 73, Fred K2TR 73, Les Rayburn, N1LF Les Rayburn, director High Noon Film 100 Centerview; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00010.html (7,594 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] ICOM 756 Pro III for six meters? (score: 1): Author: "Mike Kirchoff" <mikekirchoff@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 22:36:00 -0400; Les, I have used in turn the 756 PRO, 756 PRO II and 756 PRO III for both HF and 6 meters for almost 8 years. I can confidently endorse the PRO III for both contesting and DX operation on 6 meters. I; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00026.html (7,909 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]