Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Icom\-9700\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Icom\-9700\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Icom-9700 (score: 1): Author: "Steve$K1IIG$" <stephen.tripp@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:42:20 -0400; To those interested in this V/U transceiver a friend's son is now in Japan and visited a ham store. He saw one on display and was told it would take 2weeks to get which might be a Japanese model, not; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-06/msg00114.html (8,656 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom-9700 (score: 1): Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:37:49 -0400; Did he say what the power output would be? - Buddy WB4OMG _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-06/msg00119.html (8,028 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom-9700 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:33:35 -0500; Icom doesn't usually stray far from what they know. I expect the US-spec version will be 100/75/10 just like the IC-910H ... Keeping in mind that the radio doesn't actually exist. :-) -- Peter Laws |; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-06/msg00121.html (8,339 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom-9700 (score: 1): Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:22:46 -0400; Somebody said it would be 100 watts, on 70 cm - which would be nice. But, you are probably right, they will stick with the power levels of the '9100. - Buddy Icom doesn't usually stray far from what; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-06/msg00129.html (8,670 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]