Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Informed\s+Opinion\s+\[was\:\s+Who\'s\s+driving\s+thatrover\?\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Informed\s+Opinion\s+\[was\:\s+Who\'s\s+driving\s+thatrover\?\]\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] Informed Opinion [was: Who's driving thatrover?] (score: 1): Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:54:15 -0500; Now all we need is a judicial branch. Anyone want to volunteer for that? 73 Jim, W4KXY Here is a list of individuals who (probably) had direct input to the rules (legislative) changes that are being; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00099.html (12,541 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Informed Opinion [was: Who's driving thatrover?] (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:56:05 -0800 (PST); That would be the "Awards Committee", according to the ARRL's "General Rule 2.3", which states: " 2.3.Entrants agree to be bound by the decisions of the ARRL Awards Committee." It seems that we have; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00100.html (12,696 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]