Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+JT65\s+on\s+222\s+and\s+above\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+JT65\s+on\s+222\s+and\s+above\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] JT65 on 222 and above (score: 1): Author: Patrick Thomas <p-thomas@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:14:48 -0400 (GMT-04:00); I'm not aware of an established frequency for JT65 on 220 or higher bands. I really wanted to try yesterday around 432.076 yesterday (consistent with the .076 everywhere else) but chickened out as th; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-04/msg00114.html (8,373 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] JT65 on 222 and above (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:17:14 -0500; Yes. As long as the mode is legal where you are and you aren't interfering with an on-going QSO, who cares? Yes, there is probably a bandplan, but you'll be lucky to find another station at all, so .; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-04/msg00115.html (7,614 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] JT65 on 222 and above (score: 1): Author: Keith Morehouse <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:49:42 -0600; I believe you will get bored and go find a better use of your time before you work someone at random "on the .076", either 222 or 432. If you announce you're calling there, well fine, but just callin; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-04/msg00117.html (10,129 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] JT65 on 222 and above (score: 1): Author: Roger Rehr <w3sz73@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:29:52 -0400; Hi Patrick, I would say, "Just get on and do it" :) Don't worry about the frequency that you use; just stay out of the beacon portion of the band, find a clear spot on your bandscope, and go to it. H; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-04/msg00118.html (12,009 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] JT65 on 222 and above (score: 1): Author: k7xc_tx via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 05:30:11 -0700; Obviously avoid 222.100 or any other analog calling frequency by +/- 10 KHz. Sounds obvious doesn't it, but I have heard it done before to the detriment of everone on the band. Analog and digital j; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-04/msg00122.html (13,149 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] JT65 on 222 and above (score: 1): Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:53:35 -0700; If anyone in the vicinity of CN89 wants to try JT65 (or other digi modes) on 432 over the next few weeks let me know. Have 21 elements, LNA at the antenna and 70 watts or so at the antenna. If anyone; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-04/msg00123.html (11,599 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]