Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+June\s+VHF\s+Scores\s+Table\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+June\s+VHF\s+Scores\s+Table\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] June VHF Scores Table (score: 1): Author: "Kutzko, Sean, KX9X" <kx9x@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 11:23:28 -0500; Hello, Fellow VHF Contesters The June VHF Contest tables have been updated. QSO totals are correct now. 73, Sean Kutzko, KX9X ARRL Contest Branch Manager 225 Main St. Newington, CT 06111 (860) 594-02; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00005.html (6,594 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] June VHF Scores Table (score: 1): Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:16:46 -0700; Darn, I noticed it was QSO points and not QSO's quite early on, and was enjoying figuring out how much higher band multipliers help some of the stations (myself included) over raw QSO's. My QSO point; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00009.html (7,667 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]