Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+LMR400\s+vs\s+RG213\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+LMR400\s+vs\s+RG213\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] LMR400 vs RG213 (score: 1): Author: "Dave Larsen (WS2L)" <dirknj@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:23:56 -0400; Even though I have been licensed for 29 years it is only recently I became interested in VHF/UHF operating. This is also the first time I have dealt with LMR400 coax so the question is as follows. Th; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00065.html (7,908 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] LMR400 vs RG213 (score: 1): Author: "Bill Olson" <callbill@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:42:36 +0000; Dave, Belden 9913 was one of the first low loss "RG8 sized" coaxes to come along. It had the foil/braid outer conductor and a spiral of polyethelene between the outer and inner conductors that made t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00066.html (9,363 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] LMR400 vs RG213 (score: 1): Author: Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org>; Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:44:03 -0400; Dave Larsen (WS2L) expunged (dirknj@comcast.net): The thing people need to keep in mind here is the term "not flexible" is relevant. LMR-400 is not flexible when compared to RG-213, but very flexible; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00067.html (8,041 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] LMR400 vs RG213 (score: 1): Author: Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org>; Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:47:12 -0400; Bill Olson expunged (callbill@hotmail.com): Due to recent copper prices, we have no choice but to charge you $.05 for your comments :) -Steve N1JFU _______________________________________________ VHF; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00068.html (7,097 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]