Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Limited\s+rover\s+rules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Limited\s+rover\s+rules\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Limited rover rules (score: 1): Author: Mike Drake <mmdrevo@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:27:37 -0400; I have to agree with what has been posted in regards to dropping the 222 MHz band from the limited rover category. I personally have used 222 and like the band, however for new people coming in trans; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-06/msg00009.html (7,721 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Limited rover rules (score: 1): Author: Bob Burns W9RXR <w9rxr_@rlburns.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 19:29:48 -0400; There has to be some challenge to it. My suggestion is to leave 222 MHz in the RL rules so that the Icom IC-7000/Yaesu FT-857 crowd will have something attainable to aspire to. In fact, I've suggeste; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-06/msg00028.html (7,904 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]