Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+One\s+signal\s+per\s+band\s+\[was\:\s+REMINDER\:\s+\.\.\.\s+CU2QSOPioneers\]\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] One signal per band [was: REMINDER: ... CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Sun Jul 20 23:45:01 2003
Hi Mike, This is actually addressed on the website, in the setup instructions for the various categories of CU2QSO participation. I've restated the pertinent parts of those setup instructions below:
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00107.html (11,053 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] One signal per band [was: REMINDER: ... CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1)
Author: KA2AEV@aol.com (KA2AEV@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jul 20 23:54:19 2003
Yes, but the whole point of the one signal per band rule is to prevent multiple transmitters from being operated on the same band at the same time which if I read your message (instructions) correctl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00108.html (7,433 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] One signal per band [was: REMINDER: ... CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Mon Jul 21 00:22:28 2003
No Mike. That's not what I said. Maybe restating will help... There are two ways to assure that Rovers don't have two signals on the band at the same time: test to see if the TNC's CSMA circuit will
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00110.html (8,075 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] One signal per band [was: REMINDER: ... CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr wf4r)
Date: Mon Jul 21 13:15:12 2003
I've been reading with intrest this discussion on CU2QSO and am wondering what antenna polarity is favored for this? I could assume that since it's FM it would be verticle, but since most weak signal
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00121.html (11,949 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu