Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Proposed\s+VHF\s+Rule\s+Changes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Proposed\s+VHF\s+Rule\s+Changes\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Proposed VHF Rule Changes (score: 1): Author: "Bill Seabreeze" <w3iy@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:16:28 -0500; My 3 cents...de W3IY/R I think it's great that some people want to make VHF contests better, and encourage more activity and participation. I think the best way to do this is for QST to promote more; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00114.html (9,829 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Proposed VHF Rule Changes (score: 1): Author: "David Olean" <k1whs@worldpath.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:57:24 -0000; Hi Bill, Great letter with some good comments. I have a few comments pertaining to your idea for eliminating (or reducing) captive roving with something like a 25% rule. First off, a rover should nev; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00121.html (17,839 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Proposed VHF Rule Changes (score: 1): Author: Robert Cumming <w2bzy@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:18:44 -0500; I have been reading all the messages on this thread for the past week or so and have come to the point of having to kick in my $0.02. Having been a VHF'er since the mid 50's in the famous NE activity; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00126.html (10,970 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Proposed VHF Rule Changes (score: 1): Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:27:24 -0500; I'm not going to bore the reflector with my opinions on the various aspects of the proposed rule changes, which I *did* send to the ARRL committee. However, Dave Olean's well-written note to Bill Sea; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00129.html (10,345 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]