Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Quick\s+To\s+the\s+Mystery\s+Machine\!\s+\[The\s+Case\s+of\s+the\s+Phantom\s+Pre\-Amp\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Quick\s+To\s+the\s+Mystery\s+Machine\!\s+\[The\s+Case\s+of\s+the\s+Phantom\s+Pre\-Amp\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Quick To the Mystery Machine! [The Case of the Phantom Pre-Amp] (score: 1): Author: "Les Rayburn" <les@highnoonfilm.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:02:26 -0500; Pardon me if I mix my metaphors but, "Riddle me this, boy wonder".... Months ago, when I started on this mis-adventure, I purchased an Icom IC-910H, along with the Icom mast mount pre-amps. Now, I ca; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-08/msg00116.html (12,852 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Quick To the Mystery Machine! [The Case of the Phantom Pre-Amp] (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:14:12 -0500 (CDT); I'm guessing that the devices which performed well were actually noise-matched and the others weren't; perhaps they were just tuned for maximum gain? Many component manufacturers supply the gamma (op; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-08/msg00117.html (14,487 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Quick To the Mystery Machine! [The Case of the Phantom Pre-Amp] (score: 1): Author: "Chet, N8RA" <chetsubaccount@snet.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:05:59 -0400; FWIW- I am no expert: How much gain did the preamps have? There is some discussion in listening for weak signals to try and keep the front end gain such that the ambient noise is not higher than the; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-08/msg00120.html (15,626 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]