Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+RE\:\s+Proposed\s+VHF\s+Rule\s+Changes\s+$Bill\s+Seabreeze$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+RE\:\s+Proposed\s+VHF\s+Rule\s+Changes\s+$Bill\s+Seabreeze$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] RE: Proposed VHF Rule Changes (Bill Seabreeze) (score: 1): Author: "jon jones" <n0jk@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:42:46 +0000; My 3 cents...de W3IY/R I think it's great that some people want to make VHF contests better, and encourage more activity and participation. I think the best way to do this is for QST to promote more; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00122.html (9,172 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] RE: Proposed VHF Rule Changes (Bill Seabreeze) (score: 1): Author: SteveWS4F@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:33:27 EST; - Jon N0JK I also support this DX station change 100% as outlined by Jon. As has been pointed out very well by others here, though, most of the other proposals would be disastrous for vhf contesting.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00124.html (7,224 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]