Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+\[VHF\s+contesting\]\s+A\s+quasi\-history\s+of\s+roving\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF contesting] A quasi-history of roving (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Erickson" <k3lfo@mddsg.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:01:50 -0400 (EDT)
Jim, The Sprint Rovers: Although the Sprints are a lot of fun, They are not real conducive to roving. we spend two days minimum preparing for a rove. Most of the Sprints are also during the work week
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00175.html (11,954 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF contesting] A quasi-history of roving (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Or how about 2 categories in each class: 1,2,3 and 8 land (category 1), and everyone else (category 2)? 73s John NE0P http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00177.html (13,461 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF contesting] A quasi-history of roving (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:00:20 -0400
Jim Erickson wrote: The Rover Rules: I feel that the present rules are fine (both old origional and new). Any major changes to the Rover rules to compensate for those "questionable" practices would p
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00187.html (9,353 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF contesting] A quasi-history of roving (score: 1)
Author: K3uhf@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:00:03 EDT
I believe in us he means us rovers. _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00188.html (6,386 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu