Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Reply\s+to\s+Mark\s+K2AXX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+Reply\s+to\s+Mark\s+K2AXX\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: Reply to Mark K2AXX (score: 1): Author: braillist@sympatico.ca (Bill Burgess); Date: Mon Jul 21 13:59:21 2003; Greetings Mark. When sitting 80% of the time on 50.180 calling CQ and the band scope set to 12.5 it gives me no advantage over you. I rarely use the band scope off 12.5. Setting a band scope to cover; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00122.html (7,155 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Re: Reply to Mark K2AXX (score: 1): Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV)); Date: Mon Jul 21 18:14:24 2003; Hi Bill, You made an excellent point. Just because a tool exists, doesn't make it the best for the job. It is simply one tool in the arsenal. Just like your band scope, CU2QSO is only one such tool i; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00128.html (8,556 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]