Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:ERP\-based\s+Entry\s+Classes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:ERP\-based\s+Entry\s+Classes\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re:ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1): Author: N1OFZ <n1ofz@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:22:52 -0500; I have been rereading and rethinking Ev's proposal for many days now. It got me to thinking about why these changes were suggested in the first place. Increased participation in the higher bands. I'm; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00133.html (11,037 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re:ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1): Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:22:30 -0800 (PST); Now that "'nuf's" been finally said, I'll tack on my own post-nuf comments. Dana's done some homework and what he says here counts. Dana's reasons and those of many others who are against making majo; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00141.html (13,548 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re:ERP-based Entry Classes (score: 1): Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:18:37 -0800 (PST); I have received a correction from N1ND regarding my comments about entries being automatically being put into the Limited Multi category. Here are his comments: "I read your post to the VHF-reflector; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00143.html (15,903 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]