Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Rig\s+Suggestion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Rig\s+Suggestion\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Rig Suggestion (score: 1): Author: JT Croteau <jt@w6cfo.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 08:54:27 -0700; Ok, I want to start getting serious aboot my rover station in time for the January contest. Therefore, I need a new rig (or maybe two). Now, as far as I can tell, to get all the features I want in on; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00086.html (7,458 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rig Suggestion (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:25:06 -0700 (PDT); A Kenwood TS790 would be your requirements and not be an Icom, if you can find one used. Other than that, most of the dual receive have been Icoms. THe Kenwood TS2000 is sure a nice VHF rig, but no d; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00087.html (8,953 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rig Suggestion (score: 1): Author: Michael Urich <ka5cvh@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:26:06 -0500; Another good rig but no longer in production is the FT-726 / FT-736. The 736 is a 4 band with 144 / 430 as the core and you can add two of either 50 / 222 / 1290 -- Mike Urich, KA5CVH Actually I vote; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00092.html (7,548 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]