Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Rover\s+activity\s+in\s+2010\s+June\s+ARRL\s+VHF\s+QSO\s+Party\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Rover activity in 2010 June ARRL VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:01:31 -0600
The log submission has closed for the 2010 June ARRL VHF QSO Party and claimed scores have been posted on the ARRL site. It was a successful contest with 1107 Cabrillo logs submitted and if previous
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-07/msg00047.html (14,770 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover activity in 2010 June ARRL VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:33:25 -0500
Hello to all on the list....I was one of those that proposed the 3 tier rover class system that we have today. When I proposed what became the "Limited Rover Class", I proposed that it be ONLY 6M, 2M
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-07/msg00049.html (20,113 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover activity in 2010 June ARRL VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Jerry <jer.sieg@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:30:32 -0600
Marshall.. /R Class 'whatever'.. I think they 'All Should be Issued a Certificate for Participation'.. Listing the Grid Squares they Worked, etc.! That was a 'Lot of $' put out for everyones else's b
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-07/msg00059.html (22,985 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover activity in 2010 June ARRL VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: "John D'Ausilio" <jdausilio@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:45:36 -0400
Hi Marshall .. the reason they don't like Unlimited is because it's not counted in the club competition .. Wayne pretty much stated explicitly at MUD last year that his main goal was to get SCCC into
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-07/msg00067.html (8,482 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu