Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Rover\s+cllsign\s+vs\s+logging\s+robots\s+NOW\s+LoTW\s+certificates\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Rover cllsign vs logging robots NOW LoTW certificates (score: 1)
Author: Keith Morehouse <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:20:02 -0700
After hearing from many people who had gone the extra mile and procured what W9FZ called a "child" cetificate, I applied for and received a "rover" LoTW certificate for our club call, which is what I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-01/msg00042.html (8,160 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover cllsign vs logging robots NOW LoTW certificates (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:47:12 -0700
That's an important point. While the initial LoTW callsign validation takes a while (and I think still includes something mailed to your FCC address), any additional callsigns that can be clearly tie
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-01/msg00043.html (8,181 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu