Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Rover\s+threads\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Rover\s+threads\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Rover threads (score: 1): Author: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:40:37 -0700; Please change the charter to exclude rovers or hit delete on a rover topic you don't like. The discussion comes form the opperational practices and they are discussed here. I was trying to gracefully; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00451.html (8,870 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover threads (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc@carneysugai.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:14:15 -0700; How about just including "Rover threads" in the subject of all post regarding rover rules. Then, those of us who do not want their mailbox cluttered up can set up a mail rule to delete post with "Rov; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00452.html (10,909 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover threads (score: 1): Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:24:59 -0700; Well said Frank. AF6O _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00454.html (8,165 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover threads (score: 1): Author: George Sintchak/WA2VNV <wa2vnv@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:25:12 -0400; Tom - "Rover Threads" is an excellent idea and will not exclude anyone who really wants to follow/read it. Now, only if "they" will do it. How about just including "Rover threads" in the subject of a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00455.html (11,966 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]