Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+SG\s+Labs\s+903\s+MHz\s+Transverters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+SG\s+Labs\s+903\s+MHz\s+Transverters\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] SG Labs 903 MHz Transverters (score: 1): Author: MERLE COX <w7yoz@centurylink.net>; Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 22:41:04 -0400 (EDT); In case the wider VHF UHF operators are not aware, SG Labs of 1,296 excellent transverter fame, also produce an identical transverter for 902/903 MHz. This was prompted by James, K7KQA several years; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00039.html (7,157 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] SG Labs 903 MHz Transverters (score: 1): Author: Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 23:03:03 -0400; We use one of these in the K1SIG rover. They work well and have some nice features. I believe they are currently out of stock with 8 weeks until restock, so it's a no go for the June contest but you'; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00040.html (8,094 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] SG Labs 903 MHz Transverters (score: 1): Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 11:12:57 +0000 (UTC); A few years ago, George, WA2VNV purchased one of their 1296 transverters. It really worked well for him. Since there is not a lot of activity on 900, around here, I did not want to spend a lot of mon; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00041.html (8,098 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] SG Labs 903 MHz Transverters (score: 1): Author: James C <jabeco@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 07:53:16 -0700; Thank you for the update Merle. I haven't talked to Hyristiyan in a while. I'm very glad to hear that they are still doing the 'KQA' 33cm model. We worked together for a long time to bring these to m; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00043.html (10,062 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] SG Labs 903 MHz Transverters (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 10:41:35 -0500; I was curious how well these performed. Currently I am using a W1GHZ transverter board for 902 MHz. I got the LO board, too, and use a phase-locked 94.75 MHz crystal oscillator with it. I also built; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00044.html (10,239 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]