Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Suggestion\s+for\s+the\s+ARRL\s+June\s+VHF\s+contest\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: "Mark, K5AM" <k5am@zianet.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:59:11 +0000
Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest Recently introduced digital modes have resulted in a major change in the way contesters have operated in the June VHF contest. A wide spectrum of opinions hav
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00054.html (8,658 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 19:24:56 -0400
I'm sort of in between contesting, but have slowly started to get stuff together to start getting back into it. I'm not sure that this plan would be terribly effective at accomplishing what you want
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00055.html (10,942 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 19:54:44 -0400
The problem I have with this is that VHF awards and contests have always been mode agnostic and cross-mode QSOs are acceptable unlike on HF (Ive made a few long range QSOs calling a station in CW whi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00056.html (12,327 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: "Bob, W3IDT" <w3idt@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 20:34:30 -0400
I have a long standing proposal before the ARRL Contest Advisory Committee (CAC) for THREE contacts per station - CW, VOICE(ssb, am, fm), ANY DIGITAL - on 6m and 2m, and TWO contacts per station - AN
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00057.html (21,709 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: Pete K0BAK via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 01:11:54 +0000 (UTC)
Multiple modes per station is the best way to improve activity IMHO. Thanks for submitting this proposal; the details can be debated but the main thrust of allowing multiple modes is key. Sticking wi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00058.html (9,066 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: "Bob, W3IDT" <w3idt@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 01:16:59 -0400
Thanks Pete. But... My proposal alone will not accomplish much. Write the CAC if you agree (write even if you disagree). CAC mailing list: http://www.arrl.org/files/file/CAC%20List/CAC%20June%202022(
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00059.html (10,089 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: Alan Larson <wa6azp@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 23:35:49 -0700
Bob, W3IDT, suggests multiple contacts per remote station, based on the mode, as a solution to stations going to digital and not working analog. As such, it forces the operator who wants to be compet
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00060.html (9,784 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: John Golomb <john.golomb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 09:18:51 -0400
Some details on CAC activity. Lots of data mining to arrive at recommendation for the new "analog only" entry class. http://www.arrl.org/files/file/ODV/Board%20Meeting%20July%202022/Doc%2022%20Contes
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00062.html (12,353 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: <k3sk@buckwalter.co>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 15:31:08 -0400
I have also voiced my concerns to the ARRL and made a proposal. I disagree with the 3 contacts per station idea in that most guys will work someone, then say switch to the next mode and then the next
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00064.html (10,931 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: "Bob, W3IDT" <w3idt@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 15:45:36 -0400
David, K3SK, My proposal specifically prevents Working all 3 back to back on the same frequency. by requiring the CW contact to be in the CW exclusive band segment on 6m and 2m. Mixed CW/SSB contacts
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00065.html (12,193 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 20:28:50 +0000
This would just be a mess. I do not enjoy doing digial contests. The VHF contests have become digital contests. Indeed the VHF bands are turning into digial only bands for a lot of activity. I have g
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00066.html (11,407 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: Dave <kdcarlso@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 18:38:11 -0400
It's all I can do to get one weekend in June for a VHF contest. I guess if you're retired, have no wife or kids, and have nothing else to do during the few warm/dry weekends we get in the north, that
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00067.html (11,184 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: "JC" <n4is@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 01:40:43 -0400
I feel the same situation here in South Florida. We normally have a great propagation on 6m national wide, at the same time, SSB was good , CW was back. See the great results Steve N2CEI time put tog
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00068.html (10,501 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu