Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+The\s+new\s+CQ\s+WW\s+VHF\s+contesting\s+rules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+The\s+new\s+CQ\s+WW\s+VHF\s+contesting\s+rules\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] The new CQ WW VHF contesting rules (score: 1): Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:07:22 +0100; Hello to everyone on the list...for some reason, this topic has been playing out on the VHF reflector. Several hams have pointed out to me that this rightly belongs on the VHFContesting reflector. I; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-04/msg00056.html (11,684 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] The new CQ WW VHF contesting rules (score: 1): Author: Tim Coad <timcoad@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:21:07 -0700; Hmmm... Is that because you have to tell the software the full details for the QSO , before it can detect the full details of the QSO? Always seemed a bit odd to me... I rather have the rules allow; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-04/msg00066.html (7,619 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]