Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Transverters\s+$was\:\s+Icom\s+IC\-9700\s+Release\s+Date$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Transverters\s+$was\:\s+Icom\s+IC\-9700\s+Release\s+Date$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Transverters (was: Icom IC-9700 Release Date) (score: 1): Author: Patrick Thomas <p-thomas@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 19:48:04 -0500 (EST); To be fair, the stock 9100 covers 12 bands over two decades of RF. I have to admit I share some disappointment that 222 (and 33cm while we're dreaming) can't be included in a $1500-$2000 dedicated V/; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-12/msg00016.html (8,369 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (was: Icom IC-9700 Release Date) (score: 1): Author: aduhawk@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 08:05:11 -0600 (CST); We started roving seriously 20+ years ago using Xvrtrs for 222, 900, 1.2 and 2304. We used 706MKii and an IC820 which doubled as an IF for 1.2 and the primary for 432. We have TE Systems higher power; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-12/msg00018.html (11,109 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverters (was: Icom IC-9700 Release Date) (score: 1): Author: Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 13:09:32 -0500; The K1SIG rover uses transverters on everything but 6,2 and 70. Depending on the configuration for the particular contest, we have an IC-746, IC-910, IC-7000 and a TS-590 pulling duty on the native b; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-12/msg00019.html (12,953 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]