Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Triband\s+antenna\s+for\s+Joe\s+706\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Triband\s+antenna\s+for\s+Joe\s+706\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Triband antenna for Joe 706 (score: 1): Author: jcplatt1@mmm.com; Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:10:52 -0600; For several years I have toyed with a simple 6, 2, & 432 antenna that could be deployed for roving or portable use. Size, weight, cost, simplicity, play against gain & performance, so there has to be; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-03/msg00046.html (11,622 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Triband antenna for Joe 706 (score: 1): Author: Dan Evans <dan.evans@insightbb.com>; Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:19:46 -0500; I think we are all over looking a pretty simple solution. Typically, quads don't fit well with VHF ops because it complicates putting several antennas on the same mast. Like the traditional "Christma; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-03/msg00050.html (10,903 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Triband antenna for Joe 706 (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:16:47 -0700; Dan - While I appreciate the simplicity of the Quad antenna and even referred to N6NB's manifestation of a 144/222/432 in my post, I don't think that simply stacking the antennas concentrically will; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-03/msg00057.html (7,642 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]