Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+UHF\s+Contest\s+Microwave\s+Liaison\s+Frequency\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+UHF\s+Contest\s+Microwave\s+Liaison\s+Frequency\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] UHF Contest Microwave Liaison Frequency (score: 1): Author: specrisk@aol.com; Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:39:16 -0400; I expressed that inquiry poorly. I was inquiring about the upcoming UHF contest in August and if 144.265+/- was the only liaison frequency? George, W1JHR Send VHFcontesting mailing list submissions t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00016.html (15,876 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] UHF Contest Microwave Liaison Frequency (score: 1): Author: jcplatt1@mmm.com; Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:03:25 -0500; Hello George. Great question. I suspect that the answer may vary depending on where you live. To the best of my knowledge, here in the Upper Midwest, the answer is no, there is not a special uW liais; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00017.html (8,528 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] UHF Contest Microwave Liaison Frequency (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:23:09 -0500 (CDT); In this area we've used both 144.200 and 144.260. If either frequency was busy we'd go up or down 10 kHz or so. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing lis; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00018.html (7,286 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] UHF Contest Microwave Liaison Frequency (score: 1): Author: "Mike Metroka" <VHFRover@aol.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:05:45 -0500; I concur with Zack that in the northern Illinois area and surrounding states 144.260 MHz is used as a uW liaison frequency. I bring my 2 meter beam with me when I rove during the ARRL UHF contest and; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00021.html (8,746 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]