Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHF\s+Topics\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHF\s+Topics\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] VHF topics (score: 1): Author: "frank bechdoldt" <k3uhf@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:14:03 -0700; In fact when roving becomes an issue here the folder size for the month increases exponentially like a rovers score when he circles. I sure hope no-one debates the legitimacy of Morse code long after; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00374.html (6,627 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Topics (score: 1): Author: "John Isenberg" <ihi@frontiernet.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:34:05 -0400; Frank, couple points: Be careful of your wording on Morse Code (CW). The FCC ISN'T "removing it from being required" They are dropping the testing requirement. The requirement for code/data only band; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00380.html (6,978 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Topics (score: 1): Author: "frank bechdoldt" <k3uhf@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:54:04 -0700; sounds as clear as the roving rules. ISN'T "removing it from being required" They are dropping the testing requirement. The requirement for code/data only band segments remain. The requirement for ha; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00383.html (8,185 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]