Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHFcontesting\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+34\,Issue\s+22\s+$stacking\s+distance\s+50\,\s+144\,\s+432\,\s+144\/440$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+VHFcontesting\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+34\,Issue\s+22\s+$stacking\s+distance\s+50\,\s+144\,\s+432\,\s+144\/440$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 34,Issue 22 (stacking distance 50, 144, 432, 144/440) (score: 1): Author: steve d <kc8qvo@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:45:13 -0700 (PDT); OK, now I am getting confused. I am hearing a LOT of different things here. Some of you say to stack the 144 beam above the 50 beam at the stacking distance for 144... That doesnt make sense because; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-10/msg00065.html (8,185 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 34,Issue 22 (stacking distance 50, 144, 432, 144/440) (score: 1): Author: "frank bechdoldt" <k3uhf@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:01:23 -0700; The bigger antenna shopuld be on top. Why? Because at the lower frequency the extra 15 feet would be maybe 3 db gain at 6 meters where its maybe .5 dg gain at 432 because its allready several wavelen; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-10/msg00066.html (10,011 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]