Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+WTX\s+roving\s+part\s+2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+WTX\s+roving\s+part\s+2\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] WTX roving part 2 (score: 1): Author: K3uhf@aol.com; Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:09:03 EDT; I am glad to see that one of the stations involved spoke up. This guy is not an idiot, so lets not let frustration lead to name calling. He or they are not per say bad operators and they are more tec; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00136.html (9,782 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] WTX roving part 2 (score: 1): Author: "Mike - KM0T" <km0t@qsl.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:06:15 -0500; Not to change the subject, but where did this come from? the 2.4 and up because of snow. Some of us suggested moving that idea of theirs to January since mountains have snow on them then. That worked; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00152.html (7,447 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] WTX roving part 2 (score: 1): Author: K3uhf@aol.com; Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:28:40 EDT; It was at the NW microwave conference. We were told it was originally proposed for the June contest, but moved to the January contest. I take it this was the idea of the committees came to since last; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00162.html (7,152 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]