Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+What\s+is\s+really\s+\"wrong\"\s+with\s+the\s+ARRL\s+Rover\-category\s+rules\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+What\s+is\s+really\s+\"wrong\"\s+with\s+the\s+ARRL\s+Rover\-category\s+rules\.\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] What is really "wrong" with the ARRL Rover-category rules. (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:57:25 -0800 (PST); No...this is *not* Rover bashing. I *love* them...and have been one (and probably will be one again in the future). This is about the rules and what they do to everyone involved. It is a dispassionat; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00184.html (8,585 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] What is really "wrong" with the ARRL Rover-category rules. (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:08:59 -0800 (PST); Very well put, and sums it up nicely.... Duane N9DG _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00185.html (9,240 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] What is really "wrong" with the ARRL Rover-category rules. (score: 1): Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:10:39 -0800 (PST); Well, I don't know about "anger and angst among the greater amateur population." I guess I must be in the minority. ;-) K7CW -- On Sun, 2/15/09, Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Duane - N9; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00190.html (10,839 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] What is really "wrong" with the ARRL Rover-category rules. (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:57:10 -0700; Ev - You wrote: "It all boils down to a single point: The rules encourage the Rovers to operate in their own, independent CWAC (Contest Within A Contest), and receive host-sponsor recognition. That's; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00193.html (10,410 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] What is really "wrong" with the ARRL Rover-category rules. (score: 1): Author: Gene Gabry <gene_n9tf@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:27:54 -0800 (PST); Spot ON! Gene N9TF No...this is *not* Rover bashing. I *love* them...and have been one (and probably will be one again in the future). This is about the rules and what they do to everyone involve; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00196.html (8,860 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]