Though I generally try to encourage vhf activity, it seems that it may be a time to make a statement to the ARRL. Marshall suggested sending in empty logs in response to the EME rule change. I am not
Hello fellow VHF contesters. Based on some of the comments that I have seen, some of you may not be aware of the EME Whitepaper that is posted at http://www.arrl.org/contests/emerules.pdf . This will
The Programs and Services Committee has a lot of stuff on their plate. Most of it's members are not knowledgible about the VHF weak signal world, but they want to help. Hence, they created the VUAC,
This weekend is the famous Huntsville Hamfest and Alabama ARRL Convention. Southeastern Division Director, Greg Sarratt (W4OZK) will be in attendance. Greg is a strong VHF-UHF-Micro contest enthusias
I agree with Frank. The ARRL is NOT a democracy, evidence their dumping of the assisted category. My only disagreement is that withholding participation may not be enough. If they continue to dump on
A great idea Ron and while you are at it, contact your VUAC representative and let him know your thoughts. I am the Southeastern Division representative on the VUAC and I almost NEVER get any input o
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:35:03 -0700
The ARRL is run as a representative democracy. Members elect their Division Directors, and the Division Directors on the PSC are the ones making the rule change decisions. if you don't like the decis
Part of the reason given for dumping the Assisted category was the use of the assisting method to actually assist with the QSO. This would be wrong, obviously; once you start to make the QSO you shou