Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Yaesu\s+FT\-950\s+Comments\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Yaesu\s+FT\-950\s+Comments\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Yaesu FT-950 Comments? (score: 1): Author: Mark Adams <msadams60@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:51:39 -0400; Hi Gang, I'm considering a new rig for the shack. I am darn tired of ripping my shack apart for every rover run and FD. Right now I use a K2 for HF and an FT-100D for 6 and 2M. The K2 is slated for F; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-07/msg00016.html (7,567 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Yaesu FT-950 Comments? (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>; Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:45:21 -0500; Mike adds I'd be interested in seeing all replies go back to the list as I'm considering that rig for a purchase near the end of the year as well. -- Mike Urich http://ka5cvh.com The last time all it; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-07/msg00020.html (7,902 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Yaesu FT-950 Comments? (score: 1): Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>; Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:48:38 -0500; can u live with out 2 meters in the shack?.. theres none in the 950 If the Radio is as good as the radio it replaced (the 920, I owned one for several years) then it is a good radio. The k2 is probab; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-07/msg00021.html (8,620 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Yaesu FT-950 Comments? (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:07:34 -0500; In my case I have a FT-736R w/ 50/144/222/432. I also have a FT-840 that I would like to upgrade later this year. Down the road I could hopefully sell the 50 MHz module in the FT-736 which also went; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-07/msg00025.html (8,127 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]