Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+coax\s+for\s+50\s+and\s+144\s+questions\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] coax for 50 and 144 questions (score: 1)
Author: "David Ashworth" <fathom@dslextreme.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 05:35:49 -0000
Hi to all, thank you for the answers to my previous questions about stacking and rotors. I learned a lot. Now, a couple of questions and wonder what you are using that works. Here is the statement an
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00051.html (7,821 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] coax for 50 and 144 questions (score: 1)
Author: STeve Andre' <andres@msu.edu>
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 03:21:34 -0400
I really like 9913F7. It isn't air filled like 9913, so water isn't going to run down inside. However, you can also find *great* deals on Andrew LDF4-50 and sometimes, LDF5-50. The 1/4" LDF4-50 loses
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00052.html (8,284 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] coax for 50 and 144 questions (score: 1)
Author: "David" <ke4yyd@gtcom.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 09:18:30 -0400
I have some (150'???) of Heliax that came from a cellular tower that was dismantled. I had 4 connectors but not sure what happened to them. Not sure of the size but this stuff is really big. It measu
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00053.html (9,746 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] coax for 50 and 144 questions (score: 1)
Author: Robert Cumming <w2bzy@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 16:16:41 -0400
David A few observations from Hot, Humid Central Florida. 9913 can work if properly installed and WATERPROOFED. I have used a few runs here in the humidity of central Florida for over 15 years with n
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00054.html (11,515 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] coax for 50 and 144 questions (score: 1)
Author: John Kemker <john@kemker.org>
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:59:11 -0400
Times Microwave (manufacturers of LMR-400) makes an Ultraflex version of LMR-400 that works well with rotators, etc. Personally, I'd use that as a pigtail and look for surplus LDF5-50 Heliax to run d
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00055.html (8,903 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] coax for 50 and 144 questions (score: 1)
Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:20:31 -0700
Has anyone tried DavisRF's buryflex? On paper it looks like a cost effective alternative to LM-400 ultraflex. The Davis RF site quotes attenuation for buryflex as 2.98 db at 450Mhz. Ultraflex is stat
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00060.html (7,788 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] coax for 50 and 144 questions (score: 1)
Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
Tom, The 0.12 dB difference is not as much of a factor as the $0.20/ft difference is. That's a good price (assuming their spec is accurate, of course). Ev, W2EV ______________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00061.html (8,154 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu