Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+controversy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+controversy\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:05:50 -0700; contriversy is generated by a typo while controversy is often caused by doing things in the gray areas to achieve a personal gain in such a way others would not. Its also generated when several reaso; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00263.html (7,664 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 06:03:40 -0700; Well we cannot have all these undocumented rovers in the country without papers. It's clear we need comprehensive rover reform or would that be considered amnesty? Jim, AF6O _________________________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00264.html (7,180 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: k4gun@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:28:48 +0000; Perhaps it would help to get an idea what other rovers are doing as far as contacts with other rovers. In June, I made 251 QSOs. Of those, 13 were with other rovers. This was as a Limited Rover. That; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00268.html (9,779 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:30:08 -0700; I havent played under the new rules and thats a gas price vs rewards issue. Howevr on my best rove I worked 180 unique stations in the pacific northwest, for 600-700 qsos. I worked one rover about 35; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00273.html (11,008 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:21:16 -0600; EXTREMELY hard to quantify other than to just show you my numbers for out here in Rocky Mtn Division, Steve. (For 2006 & 2007. I couldn't rove this year in June.) I can e-mail you the logs off-list i; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00300.html (13,640 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: Dan Evans <dan.evans@insightbb.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:48:03 -0400; I've been holding back on this topic. Mainly because doing the math makes my head ache... I don't understand how they pulled it off. [If, in fact they did grid circle. I wasn't there.] It seems to me; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00304.html (7,851 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: Dan Evans <dan.evans@insightbb.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:14:40 -0400; It is very rare for me to work another Rover. I don't believe I worked more than 3 or 4 in June, and they were likely 6m e-skip... _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailin; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00305.html (8,737 bytes)
8. [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:06:16 -0600; It seems to me the limited and classic [10 bands each...] Rover would exceeded the 100 limit when they hit the fifth grid? Did they then go their own way? I am not, nor is anyone, really sure of what; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00319.html (10,870 bytes)
9. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: k4gun@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:55:52 +0000; You don't have to wait for the scores to come out. Take a look at the log submissions and you'll see that they have the claimed scores posted. Put that into a spreadsheet and take a look at the top s; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00354.html (13,756 bytes)
10. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:39:23 -0700; The funny thing is, the stations that are dominating now with their legal, but claimed by some "unethical" techniques will continue to win, whatever the rules are, because they will plan their operat; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00358.html (9,356 bytes)
11. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: Jerry Siegmund <jer.sieg@shaw.ca>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:41:32 -0600; Yes.. Rules are Rules.. and with them come Controversy and also Loop Holes. I acquired the Call Sign VE6JEE that I planned on using /portable in my Jeep. (VE6Jee/p.. kinda cute, eh!) What I was inten; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00359.html (11,441 bytes)
12. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: k4gun@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:03:52 +0000; Why unlimited? With those power levels, you could enter as Limited Rover. _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesti; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00361.html (13,026 bytes)
13. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: Jerry Siegmund <jer.sieg@shaw.ca>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:16:30 -0600; Either Or.. I wanted to be Jee/p .. not Jee/r anyways! :-) _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00362.html (14,077 bytes)
14. [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:09:09 -0500; Jeepers - Creepers Beaver its just a call sign <grin> -- Mike Urich, KA5CVH http://ka5cvh.com Buy, watch, cry, share http://bordermovie.com http://drugwarsthemovie.com _______________________________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00368.html (8,941 bytes)
15. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:57:59 -0600; I think it is dangerous to extrapolate contest results from claimed scores and soapbox entries. I think it is also dangerous to come to conclusions as to the fairness of operating practices of the le; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00380.html (12,760 bytes)
16. Re: [VHFcontesting] Controversy (score: 1): Author: Dave Agsten <w4txs@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:18:34 -0700 (PDT); I think that rather than complaining about the "Grid Circling" guys, they should be given credit for their innovation and technical expertise. You have to admit, they put together some very fine rove; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00381.html (9,283 bytes)
17. Re: [VHFcontesting] Controversy (score: 1): Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:36:18 -0700; Dave, you totally hit the nail on the head. Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00382.html (8,557 bytes)
18. Re: [VHFcontesting] Controversy (score: 1): Author: Glen Overby <goverby@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:39:18 -0800; Well, I guess I must be completely missing it then. I don't see anything innovative about grid circling and I don't see much technicly challenging about their setup - either electronicly or mechanicl; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00395.html (9,136 bytes)
19. Re: [VHFcontesting] Controversy (score: 1): Author: k4gun@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:03:16 +0000; That may well be the case. These guys may just be better at this than the rest of us and if so, more power to them. I simply think operating as a team places them in a different category than the res; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00398.html (11,194 bytes)
20. Re: [VHFcontesting] Controversy (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@lcisp.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:34:45 -0800; stations are not operating as teams. How do you know this? There is plenty of team contesting at the HF level (NAQP, NAspring, etc) how do you know it doesn't occur at VHF? has better antennas, bette; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00399.html (9,527 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]