Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+curious\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+curious\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] curious (score: 1): Author: Herb Krumich <wa2fgk@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:36:47 -0800 (PST); As anyone else noticed how little the ARRL VHF column has been promoting anything above six meters ? About 90% of the article has been 50 mhz. Any thoughts Herb at WA2FGK ____________________________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00032.html (6,803 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] curious (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:10:42 -0600; *Easily* 90% of the QSOs made above 50 MHz are also made below 54 MHz (yes, I'm ignoring FM). If there is activity you have been involved in above that, you should submit it to N0JK - he'll print it.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00036.html (7,638 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] curious (score: 1): Author: Keith Morehouse <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:33:27 -0600; N0JK depends on input from others to write that column. Jon doesn't have a home station and is in a poor location to report on 1st person activity above 6M. He reports on what others report to him. J; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00037.html (7,677 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]