Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+diplexer\s+vs\s+coax\s+switch\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+diplexer\s+vs\s+coax\s+switch\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] diplexer vs coax switch (score: 1): Author: "Michael Sapp" <wa3tts@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:20:02 -0400; John KM4KMU wrote: No single cable had a VSWR over 1.10 with most being 1.05 or less. With the CF-4160 inserted the VSWR to the 440 antenna >jumped to 2.4 to 2.9 and the 144 was at 1.6 to 1.8 across; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00019.html (18,199 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] diplexer vs coax switch (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 13:34:39 -0500; Nice. Once caveat with a diplexer. I have a Comet CF-4160J (all SO-239, 2m/70 cm) to connect some old AEA IsoPoles to a single run of LMR400 to the radio room at N5UWY. These antennas never really wo; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00020.html (9,234 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]