Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ multi: 1859 ] [ port: 5999 ] [ com (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ cards: 984 ]

Total 52 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [WriteLog] WriteLog Digest, Vol 132, Issue 24 (score: 28)
Author: "NR Smith" <nrsmith@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 22:31:02 -0600
Thanks Gary I had forgotten about the later method. I will try that for him and myself. I had used that sometime ago but really did not have much luck with it. As far as sending I am not for sure how
/archives//html/WriteLog/2013-12/msg00091.html (15,328 bytes)

42. [WriteLog] serial interface PCI expansion boards (score: 28)
Author: Ron Stordahl" <ronald.stordahl@digikey.com (Ron Stordahl)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:06:18 -0500
Thanks Dave. You are 100% correct. And this is exactly why not all serial expansion cards will work...5 bit code is from their point of view an artifact of history...its doubtful that some even test
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-07/msg00108.html (23,674 bytes)

43. Re: [WriteLog] Time to Upgrade Hardware (score: 26)
Author: Alfred Frugoli <ke1fo@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:08:47 -0500
ARRL did a review of some sound cards a couple years back. If you're a member, the review is on the ARRL site here<http://www.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0705.pdf>. They didn't run the "write
/archives//html/WriteLog/2009-11/msg00055.html (10,702 bytes)

44. [WriteLog] CW and writelog stutttttering (score: 25)
Author: ve3pn@igs.net (Peter Barron)
Date: Wed Feb 19 01:00:12 2003
G'day Wayne and all Oh this is not my idea of fun I tried following With DLPORTIO or USERPORT (Windows 2000 or XP, XP since put on back burner) 1 Onboard LPT Port at all 3 addresses only standard 378
/archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00452.html (8,999 bytes)

45. Re: [WriteLog] CW decoding (score: 23)
Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 17:11:11 -0900
Nick, You don't mention it, but what kind of CW decoding are you trying to accomplish? The standard decoding through the Rttyrite window or the multi-channel decoder found at Setup/CW Decoder...? The
/archives//html/WriteLog/2013-12/msg00085.html (9,869 bytes)

46. [WriteLog] serial interface PCI expansion boards (score: 22)
Author: sdyer@interlogue.com (Steve Dyer)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 17:01:19 -0700
Dave is correct. I was wrong when I said it was bit banging. A more detailed reference to the 16550 is http://www.national.com/ds/PC/PC16550D.pdf. This doc even includes some timing charts for baudot
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-07/msg00110.html (22,195 bytes)

47. [WriteLog] serial interface PCI expansion boards (score: 22)
Author: w7dpw@attbi.com (Dave W7DPW)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:59:18 -0700
The UART takes the 5-bit parallel Baudot code and converts it into a serial stream and its start(1) and stop(1.5) bits on transmit and conversely on Receive, it converts the 5-bit serial code, along
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-07/msg00106.html (21,192 bytes)

48. [WriteLog] serial interface PCI expansion boards (score: 22)
Author: ronald.stordahl@digikey.com (Ronald Stordahl)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:21:23 -0000
So then its irrelevant as to if the UART is programmed to generate 5, 7 or 8 bit code? Do you pick one of them just for the fun of it? It would be fun to see the actual code to see what commands are
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-07/msg00105.html (20,395 bytes)

49. [WriteLog] serial interface PCI expansion boards (score: 22)
Author: sdyer@interlogue.com (Steve Dyer)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 14:06:54 -0700
The 5 bit baudot code data is NOT on the TXD line. The TXD line only carries mark/space signaling which represents baudot characters. A fine point I realize. Look at the FSK interfaces in the WL or M
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-07/msg00104.html (18,332 bytes)

50. [WriteLog] DTR active during boot patch (score: 17)
Author: don.wsixffh@verizon.net (Donald Eriksen)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:38:34 -0700
Thanks Larry - you cleared that up for me. I do have a multi com port card (not sure, probably SIIG), so I guess will just have to live with it. Don W6FFH don.wsixffh@verizon.net on RTS away I during
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-06/msg00092.html (11,137 bytes)

51. Re: [WriteLog] Simple & compact USB>Radio Control/CW/DVK/RTTY interface (score: 14)
Author: Don Melcher <don@hfradio.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Right - I am hoping because it is portable, single radio and the current PC's have more "omph" that it won't be a problem. I have 4 of the W5XB/MK1100 boxes for the 2 (eventually 3) SO2R positions at
/archives//html/WriteLog/2009-10/msg00108.html (14,680 bytes)

52. Re: [WriteLog] Simple & compact USB>Radio Control/CW/DVK/RTTY interface (score: 14)
Author: "Dick Dievendorff" <dieven@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:44:52 -0700
You're right, many people have success with this. I think most of my negative experiences have been in multi-op operations where the computer was busy reading packet spots, maintaining a largish shar
/archives//html/WriteLog/2009-10/msg00107.html (13,760 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu