- 1. [WriteLog] Writelog and CW (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:40:20 -0600
- I have been using Writelog for sometime on my old Pentium II 350 machine with Windows 98 SE. It works like a charm and I have no real problems. Unfortunately it appears like I may have to upgrade thi
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-11/msg00067.html (6,712 bytes)
- 2. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog and CW (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:16:01 -0600
- Mike and George, I wasn't going to put XP on the old computer; I was just going to buy a new one. The reason that I was thinking about changing is that I have had a networking problem that I think is
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-11/msg00070.html (11,737 bytes)
- 3. Re: [WriteLog] Recently purchased Writelog (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:53:00 -0600
- I'm not sure if this has any bearing but my sister-in-law lives in Georgetown, Texas where Ron lives. She sent a check to me a few weeks ago and it never got here. It finally wound up back in her mai
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-02/msg00009.html (9,774 bytes)
- 4. Re: [WriteLog] Cut number confusion (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:45:10 -0600
- I'm not sure what this has to do with Writelog, but I very much dislike the use of cut numbers, too. N for 9 has been in heavy use for years and I don't have a problem with that, and not with K = 100
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-02/msg00138.html (11,153 bytes)
- 5. Re: [WriteLog] 10.62h upgrade (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:37:36 -0600
- I had problem you mention below sometime ago and had the devil of a time getting it to work. Some fellow e-mailed the fix and it worked fine. I apologize for not thinking of it sooner. It should be i
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-02/msg00160.html (13,528 bytes)
- 6. Re: [WriteLog] BS7H 30M Online Log Search (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 21:43:27 -0500
- I'm not too sure what this has to do with Writelog but I worked them on 30 at 1252Z on May 3rd. It is not in the log. They were strong enough for me to be pretty certain that they had my call right.
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-05/msg00024.html (9,100 bytes)
- 7. Re: [WriteLog] Inconsistent CW Output (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 22:40:38 -0500
- You may be getting RF into your computer. Bill, W5VX _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelo
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-07/msg00017.html (7,835 bytes)
- 8. [WriteLog] Win XP (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:37:56 -0500
- One of these days I am going to have to retire my current Win 98 radio computer for logging and contesting and begin using either my current WinXP or a newer Vista computer. I have resisted changing
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-07/msg00068.html (6,858 bytes)
- 9. Re: [WriteLog] Win XP (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:40:59 -0500
- Hola Phil, et al, Looks like I have been dreading this change all this time for nothing. I have several options - (some even within the capabilities of even my intellect!) Apparently, I can use the s
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-07/msg00072.html (10,756 bytes)
- 10. Re: [WriteLog] Yaesu FT-2000 and Kenwood 4780HX (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:14:18 -0500
- I would also like to be able to use Writelog with the FT2000. I think that I am going to be getting one soon and don't want to change to a different logging program. Bill, W5VX I noticed no selection
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-08/msg00065.html (8,019 bytes)
- 11. [WriteLog] FT2000 and DXBase/Writelog (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:38:51 -0500
- I have had a couple of inquiries regarding how I came out with getting my FT2000 to play nicely with DXBase and Writelog. Since I am obviously NOT very computer literate, I had a lot of help from Ken
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-10/msg00019.html (10,718 bytes)
- 12. [WriteLog] FT2000 and DXBase/Writelog -one last thing (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:55:38 -0500
- I forgot to mention that there are three settings in the FT2000 menu that need to match the serial port and configuration. 027 GEnE CAT BPS - should match your serial port (4800 in my case) 028 GEnE
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-10/msg00020.html (6,774 bytes)
- 13. Re: [WriteLog] CTY Frustration (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:40:04 -0500
- Ah Ha! I was wondering why the E7 didn't come up. I got the newest country version and assumed that it was all ok. No big problem of course, it was only a phone contest. I guess that I'll have to add
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-10/msg00108.html (8,825 bytes)
- 14. [WriteLog] Time (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 11:13:09 -0500
- It seems like every few years I screw up the times in a contest and this time looks like a perfect opportunity for me to mess it up again. I am in the Central Time Zone, so during the contest my time
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00003.html (7,256 bytes)
- 15. [WriteLog] I wish that Writelog had (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 10:35:23 -0600
- ...clock that continuously shows the current time for Writelog. My logging program has this and I sure like to be sure I know the Writelog time as opposed to the time my computer is set at. I know, I
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-11/msg00091.html (6,981 bytes)
- 16. Re: [WriteLog] request list of rigs needing an updated WL driver (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:09:23 -0600
- Wayne, I am using the FT2000 with the FT9000 set up and it does indeed work fine. Bill, W5VX I am reconstructing from past emails and reflector postings a list of rigs that need updated drivers for W
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-12/msg00074.html (9,676 bytes)
- 17. Re: [WriteLog] Does anyone use WL's LOTW capability? (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 22:44:18 -0600
- I follow the exact procedure as Ron. I do however; think that the LOTW upload feature might be a great asset to some. Bill, W5VX No, and for this reason: I import my Q's into DXBase2007 and then, per
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2007-12/msg00115.html (10,657 bytes)
- 18. Re: [WriteLog] FT-2000D support (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:21:25 -0600
- My version 10.63H works very nicely with my FT2000. You do have to select the FT9000 on mine since it has no FT2000. Bill, W5VX Does the newest version of writelog support the FT-2000 series. I have
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2008-01/msg00082.html (7,849 bytes)
- 19. [WriteLog] 160 Contest (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:54:32 -0600
- I am just fooling around in the 160 contest and I am having a little problem with the logging. It seems that Writelog is expecting me to enter the "section" not "state". I feel sure that this is a "c
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2008-01/msg00140.html (7,351 bytes)
- 20. Re: [WriteLog] how I fixed my 160 log file issue (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:22:59 -0600
- That's a little too complicated for me, particularly since I am not really competing in the contest. This is clearly not an outcome that is intended by the folks at Writelog, and I have never had thi
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2008-01/msg00143.html (8,648 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu