Mail Archive Search: <+from:k1uq@email.msn.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k1uq@email.msn.com: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Yaesu G-1000DXA (score: 1): Author: k1uq@email.msn.com (MorseCode2000); Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:13:44 -0500; Yes, SARtek can be found at the URL below. FYI - the relay board goes into rotator (I'm using SARtek with a Yaesu G-800SDX) and the control board can be EITHER inside your computer or you can have ex; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00153.html (7,813 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Yaesu G-1000DXA INTERFACES (score: 1): Author: k1uq@email.msn.com (MorseCode2000); Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 20:04:49 -0500; If I remember correctly, SARtek is of Canadian origin - could FOB Canada (vs US) provide any financial relief for Europeans? Bill K1UQ in and computer GS-232A labeled my a -- WWW: http://www.writelog; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00157.html (12,266 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Sartek Rotor control (score: 1): Author: k1uq@email.msn.com (MorseCode2000); Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 20:02:30 -0500; See it here - lot's of info - - http://www.hosenose.com/sartek/index.html I use SARtek with a Yaesu G-800SDX - but not yet with WL. SARtek has been flawless. Great product. 73, Bill K1UQ -- WWW: http; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00060.html (8,205 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] WriteLog upgrade policy- upDATES or upGRADES? (score: 1): Author: k1uq@email.msn.com (MorseCode2000); Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 22:20:56 -0500; Very cleanly phrased. Quit griping people, you spend more than that on junk food, crappy coffee, etc. in a year. Cut back on the swill, spend the 30 bucks, lose a few pounds, and be in better shape f; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00121.html (9,143 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] KG4WK appears as Guantanamo Bay (score: 1): Author: k1uq@email.msn.com (MorseCode2000); Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 21:12:19 -0500; I checked http://wtbwww05.fcc.gov/default.sph/UlsQueryLic.exe , entered KG4WK and it comes up "No matches found for the specified search criteria". Bill K1UQ In -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submi; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00162.html (8,328 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] Cabrillo, 2 more cents (score: 1): Author: k1uq@email.msn.com (MorseCode2000); Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:38:56 -0500; Goin' after one of those "NEW" awards, eh? ... "Worked All OOs" ?? "5 Band OO" ?? Arrgh, I hate when that happens! I've done it too! -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submissions: writelog@contesting.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00001.html (8,408 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] Suggestions (score: 1): Author: k1uq@email.msn.com (MorseCode2000); Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 10:06:11 -0500; A user should NOT have to go to an INI file to invoke reasonable "options". Affecting the log fields could, and in my opinion should, be available through a drop-down menu with a collection of Tab ca; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00395.html (15,381 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] Suggestions (score: 1): Author: k1uq@email.msn.com (MorseCode2000); Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 11:52:00 -0500; Reasonable & Proper can easily be defined: Reasonable - is when a developer has the ability to include a feature within current code, and do so with time-to-market constraints, costs, has the resourc; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00399.html (10,626 bytes)
9. [WriteLog] date format and other problems (score: 1): Author: k1uq@email.msn.com (MorseCode2000); Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 12:08:57 -0500; Bruce, I too am a former user of CT. I won't go back to CT (unless at a m/m, field day, etc where I have no choice). As long as I have a choice and I can make the decision, it will NOT be CT, and WIL; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00400.html (10,918 bytes)
10. [WriteLog] cabrillo (score: 1): Author: k1uq@email.msn.com (MorseCode2000); Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 05:29:24 -0500; Cabrillo Format does not require (i.e. want) this type info. Dupes, etc. are determined from processing the data itself within your Cabrillo file. For details and explanation including FAQs, go to: h; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00434.html (9,063 bytes)
11. [WriteLog] cabrillo (score: 1): Author: k1uq@email.msn.com (MorseCode2000); Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 07:24:55 -0500; I disagree. WL does as it should in creating the Cabrillo file. It creates it to the spec. Your WL log shows the dupes, doesn't it? All it does then is export this same data into the format of Cabril; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00466.html (9,093 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]