Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:llindblom@juno.com: 150 ]

Total 150 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [WriteLog] Re: [RTTY] Don't send IN during the exchange! (score: 1)
Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:41:54 -0600
I prefer to see W0ETC 599 DE DE WB3LGC but other might like the /. or - between the two DEs. Don't listen to me but pay attention to how the majority want to see it. Amen! And clicking on highlighted
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00101.html (8,177 bytes)

102. [WriteLog] Writeelog - MMTTY Problem Resolved (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 22:21:40 GMT
A month or so back I reported trying MMTTY in FSK mode with Writelog and having problems with the receive audio level after a transmission either being over driven or extremely low. In either case de
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00123.html (7,350 bytes)

103. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog V/S sound card (score: 1)
Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:08:35 -0600
I'd been running MMTTY in AFSK mode and had rock stead sound levels. But, when I tried it in FSK mode I had the same problem you described. Finally out of desperation I renamed my Writelog.ini file a
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00198.html (9,576 bytes)

104. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog V/S sound card (score: 1)
Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:55:30 -0600
The problem I was having on RTTY, was after transmitting and going back to receive the receive level varied greatly - from over driven to too low to decode. The full reinstall with a new INI file res
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00208.html (12,895 bytes)

105. Re: [WriteLog] WL 10.45 new feature (score: 1)
Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:06:13 -0600
I 100% agree with Don on this. If I call you it is because you are not showing in my log! Please work and log me even if I'm a dupe for you. And, as someone else noted, it will take less time for you
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00380.html (7,762 bytes)

106. Re: [WriteLog] What should change in WriteLog w.r.t. this review? (score: 1)
Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 18:38:51 -0600
1. My first logging program was NA which I stuck with until Wlog was in Version 9.27(?). I found the transition to Wlog to be almost painless. It appears to me the author of the review cut his eye te
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00051.html (14,122 bytes)

107. [WriteLog] 10.45M QUestion (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 21:42:07 GMT
Can someone who is literate please interpret the following statement about changes in WriteLog 10.45M from Geek to English" "A conversion program is installed to switch use of WRITELOG.INI over to th
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00075.html (6,709 bytes)

108. RE: [WriteLog] 10.45M Question (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 22:17:51 GMT
Thanks, that was sort of my guess, but I needed a 2nd opinion. Lets hope the registry never gets horked and needs to be edited, because a bad edit in Writelog.ini is one thing bud a bad edit in the r
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00078.html (8,451 bytes)

109. Re: [WriteLog] 10.45M Question (score: 1)
Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 20:00:42 -0600
But, I've seen a bad register edit totally hose window to the point of requiring a complete reinstall of everything. Reinstalling WriteLog is easy but a total reinstall of Windows and the Apps is a p
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00081.html (8,287 bytes)

110. Re: [WriteLog] CT Compatibility (score: 1)
Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 20:08:39 -0600
Interesting my outcome after the upgrade with CtCompatibleAccel=YES is pushing F1 still send the F11 CQ message and that is still what shows in Tools Keyboard Shortcuts. Wonder why my upgrade retaine
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00082.html (7,794 bytes)

111. Re: [WriteLog] CT Compatibility (score: 1)
Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:14:02 -0600
Mine was just the upgrade to 10.45M. However, the prior "upgrade" was a full install as I do my annual renewal in late December. 73 W0ETC _______________________________________________ WriteLog mail
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00092.html (7,913 bytes)

112. Re: [WriteLog] FMRE contest log problem (score: 1)
Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:20:24 -0600
Hold down the shift key and hit the enter key. WLog will then enter the "invalid" QSO. 73 W0ETC On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:24:33 -0600 "Jim Sharp" <jimsharp55@comcast.net> writes: ________________________
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00144.html (10,533 bytes)

113. Re: [WriteLog] Delayed repeat CQ (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:18:12 GMT
Hold down the ALT key and then hit T. This should bring up a window allowing you to enter a time value. Use a value equal to the approximate length of your CQ buffer plus whatever period of time you
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00323.html (8,022 bytes)

114. Re: [WriteLog] Ability to QSL numbers given to you by other stn (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:46:17 GMT
Off the top of my head with WL 10.45 the message command is %Fn and %F4 is what did the trick in WPX The n is the number of the entry field you want to send and in WPX the 4th field contains the rece
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00339.html (8,075 bytes)

115. Re: [WriteLog] Ability to QSL numbers given to you by other stn (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:28:17 GMT
I used %F4 under marginal conditons (sub ESP copy) to ask 189 189 189 ???? (if I'd copied something that might or might not be 189), and again under marginal conditions for a TU message that was some
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00358.html (9,979 bytes)

116. Re: [WriteLog] FW: Ability to QSL numbers given to you by other stn (score: 1)
Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:18:58 -0600
I to make frequent use of NR NR NR. However even after doing that multiple times there are occasions when there is no clean winner. As in 189 printed 6 times, 188 printed five times and pure garbage
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00359.html (10,795 bytes)

117. Re: [WriteLog] What's wrong with AFSK? was - 5 bit mystery unraveled (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:51:54 GMT
_________________________________________________________ When AFSK is done properly, it is indistinguishable from FSK at the receiver end. The problem is it can easily get out of adjustment, mainly
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-03/msg00011.html (8,903 bytes)

118. RE: [Writelog] RE: fullcallsign.wav voice-keying (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:14:12 GMT
And in a year or two we will be taking speech recognition in WriteLog that will decode vice, pop the call sign into the entry window and then send the proper voice message, etc without human interven
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-03/msg00283.html (13,365 bytes)

119. RE: [Writelog] RE: fullcallsign.wav voice-keying (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:20:41 GMT
Yes, decoding vice might be fun but I left the o out of voice. And in a year or two we will be taking speech recognition in WriteLog that will decode vice, pop the call sign into the entry window and
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-03/msg00284.html (13,790 bytes)

120. Re: [WriteLog] sound board (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:34:36 GMT
W9ALS has s sound boad page on his web site (http://www.qsl.net/wa9als/sound_results.htm) showing the scores of various sound boards. However, it was last revised in 2001. I wonder if John is interes
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-03/msg00315.html (8,582 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu