Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa9als@starband.net: 574 ]

Total 574 documents matching your query.

341. [WriteLog] More on single QTC hang (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 18:40:44 -0500
If I click on two QTCs in quick succession, it doesn't hang after the first one, but it still does after the second one. When I click on only 1 and it hangs at the end, if I click on another it will
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00256.html (6,637 bytes)

342. [WriteLog] More on single QTC hang (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 21:12:28 -0500
Steve, I think you misunderstood. It's not that they aren't queued. If I send just one, like in response to a repeat request, it hangs at the end of the QTC, in diddle. However, if I click on another
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00262.html (8,556 bytes)

343. [WriteLog] Re Sending CW (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 10:29:37 -0500
also radio) resistor soldered and Even easier - RS has DB-9s with pins that are separate - You just solder them onto your wire, then insert them into the DB-9 connector - THus no danger of shorting
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00292.html (7,660 bytes)

344. [WriteLog] QTC question again please (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:50:33 -0500
I'd like to figure this out now and not have the same questions next year! Would someone just please tell me what's supposed to happen when you click on a transmitted QTC in response to a repeat requ
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00300.html (6,997 bytes)

345. [WriteLog] Entry Window Question (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:35:20 -0500
Wrong (again) - He said -just- hit the INSERT key - You don't need to use the mouse at all to get the last highlighted callsign. Surely you don't expect something easier that hitting 1 button? You c
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00310.html (8,215 bytes)

346. [RTTY] Re: [WriteLog] S56A WAE RTTY score (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:34:08 -0500
I had the same problem with MMTTY, I traced the problem to accessing a COM port for FSK or PTT. If you use AFSK and don't use any COM ports from MMTTY, the program works fine. This problem occurs onl
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00319.html (7,644 bytes)

347. [WriteLog] Sound board bad audio (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 21:04:05 -0500
You're depressing me! I figured one day I would get around to recording some sound files for WriteLog (after I figured out RTTY and CW). I have started playing with it, just learning the ropes, usin
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00343.html (9,165 bytes)

348. [WriteLog] WrieLog's logging format? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:45:51 -0500
contest gurus? If so, what are they? Only three files are needed: ** 1. A plain-text ASCII summary sheet MUST be included. WL does this easily - Choose Contest|Create Summary Sheet. In the box that
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00379.html (8,246 bytes)

349. [WriteLog] PK232 ?huh (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:57:21 -0500
With Reminder - This is the WriteLog reflector. That said, I don't understand this whole thread very well. FSK refers to a transmission technique. With FSK (instead of AFSK), you don't have the abil
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00380.html (9,145 bytes)

350. [WriteLog] sweepstakes log > DX4Win (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:26:40 -0500
format Not that I am aware of. There is the wl2dx4win.exe program that converts files from SOME contests to a format where you don't, for example, lose the state info, but it doesn't cover Sweepstak
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00435.html (7,056 bytes)

351. [WriteLog] 2000-2001 Master Callsign Databases Now Available (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:13:13 -0500
Look in HELP, under Super Check Partial.
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00455.html (6,822 bytes)

352. [WriteLog] websites down? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 22:22:02 -0500
http://www.writelog.com/ just worked fine for me. GL - 73
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00484.html (6,509 bytes)

353. [WriteLog] CW pitch (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 07:01:14 -0500
What's the ini file parameter to set the default CW pitch? My WriteLog CW Receiver today started coming up with Rx 5000. I have no idea how it changed from 600. I can't click on it and enter a new va
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00486.html (6,753 bytes)

354. [WriteLog] CW pitch (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 08:04:17 -0500
Wheeeeeeee!
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00488.html (6,644 bytes)

355. [WriteLog] Writelog equivalent of WF1B .AIR file? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 15:49:49 -0500
Doug, there isn't one. I think being able to record the whole contest audio and replay whichever QSO you want by right-clicking on the QSO is supposed to replace the need for the .air file. The reco
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00494.html (8,918 bytes)

356. [WriteLog] Writelog equivalent of WF1B .AIR file? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 23:08:57 -0500
Great idea for RTTY - tnx! What about CW though? HI I still think the automatic generation of a file with the contents of the Rttyrite window for the whole contest is a reasonable idea. It helps to b
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00502.html (10,091 bytes)

357. [WriteLog] Curious?? (long) (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 05:23:34 -0500
(I'm sending this to the reflector in case there are other friendly undecided lurkers out there like Jerry. Hey, my post below might be long, but at least it didn't come with a virus!) Jerry, I'll ta
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00557.html (15,065 bytes)

358. [WriteLog] File backup-good news (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (wa9als@starband.net)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 07:49:30 -0500
ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGH! -This- is a virus! However, Norton didn't catch it!
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00565.html (7,322 bytes)

359. [WriteLog] Curious?? (long) (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:40:26 -0500
Just curious - like what? I don't use DOS or TR - Tell me what I'm missing. Does it decode the CW and dup and mult check for you without any intervention AT ALL on your part? I find that alone very s
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00573.html (9,241 bytes)

360. [WriteLog] Curious?? (long) (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:54:59 -0500
ask Admittedly, I'm not a "CW contester", but I don't see how that feature can be 'useless', especially if you have the monitor real estate for the window. After hundreds of Q's, noone can dupe and m
/archives//html/WriteLog/2001-11/msg00578.html (7,991 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu