Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Re\:\s+\[WriteLog\]\s+IC765\s+vs\s+IC756\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Re\:\s+\[WriteLog\]\s+IC765\s+vs\s+IC756\]\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Re: [WriteLog] IC765 vs IC756] (score: 1): Author: ac5aa@usa.net (Duane Calvin); Date: 12 Feb 2002 08:59:28 CST; Not at all - ICOM, Ten-Tec and others allow you to use ONE COM PORT to address multiple rigs. Running KW's, you have to have a com port for every rig (in addition to your TNC's, bandswitch boxes, etc; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-02/msg00288.html (7,859 bytes)
2. [Re: [WriteLog] IC765 vs IC756] (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:27:25 -0800; _________________________________________________________ Ok, I'll give you that. I don't run multiple rigs, so the Kenwood advantage of one standard doesn't apply. What's needed is a single standard; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-02/msg00292.html (7,360 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]