Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Cabrillo\s+output\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Cabrillo output (score: 1)
Author: "VE3XD" <ve3xd@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 10:20:35 -0500
Hi, Your submission to 160meter@arrl.org does not appear to be in the required Cabrillo format. Old style electronic summary sheets and log files no longer meet the file format requirements of the co
/archives//html/WriteLog/2010-12/msg00016.html (7,417 bytes)

2. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo output (score: 1)
Author: "Wayne, W5XD" <w5xd@writelog.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 08:51:05 -0800
files the longer by ...stuff deleted... Yes, me too. In my case, it was my email program and not the Cabrillo file itself that was the problem. In my case the fix was: Do NOT send an HTML format mes
/archives//html/WriteLog/2010-12/msg00019.html (7,820 bytes)

3. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo output (score: 1)
Author: "VE3XD" <ve3xd@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 12:17:34 -0500
That's very interesting. I usually switch to Plain Text when I send a message to a Mail Archive but as you said since there was no text body I did not switch from HTML. If that is the problem (and I'
/archives//html/WriteLog/2010-12/msg00022.html (9,753 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo output (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 10:48:20 -0700
No Don, as Wayne pointed out, it's not the log OR the robot. It's the configuration of your E-mail program. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us ___________
/archives//html/WriteLog/2010-12/msg00023.html (7,776 bytes)

5. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo output (score: 1)
Author: "K9OR" <k9or@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 12:24:46 -0600
Don, Try using a single line for category info as shown below and see if the robot accepts it. 73 Randy K9OR -- START-OF-LOG: 3.0 LOCATION: ON CALLSIGN: VE3XD CATEGORY: SINGLE-OP 160M LOW CW CLAIMED-
/archives//html/WriteLog/2010-12/msg00024.html (7,539 bytes)

6. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo output (score: 1)
Author: "VE3XD" <ve3xd@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:29:30 -0500
Thanks all for the assistance. 73, Don VE3XD Don, Try using a single line for category info as shown below and see if the robot accepts it. 73 Randy K9OR -- START-OF-LOG: 3.0 LOCATION: ON CALLSIGN: V
/archives//html/WriteLog/2010-12/msg00025.html (8,532 bytes)

7. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo output (score: 1)
Author: "VE3XD" <ve3xd@rogers.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:30:16 -0500
Thanks all for the assistance. 73, Don VE3XD Don, Try using a single line for category info as shown below and see if the robot accepts it. 73 Randy K9OR -- START-OF-LOG: 3.0 LOCATION: ON CALLSIGN: V
/archives//html/WriteLog/2010-12/msg00026.html (8,350 bytes)

8. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo output (score: 1)
Author: "Lyle K. Ten Pas" <ltenpas@wi.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:29:01 -0600
I read the file with WORD, and saved it as plain text. It created a separate file, so it did change something, although it was not readily apparent what it changed. It did not work before the this ch
/archives//html/WriteLog/2010-12/msg00027.html (9,538 bytes)

9. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo output (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 15:18:46 -0700
-- Jim Reisert AD1C, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis
/archives//html/WriteLog/2010-12/msg00028.html (8,326 bytes)

10. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo output (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 02:07:09 -0500
So why has this become a problem now? I've used the same technique to successfully send my log for years: I generate the Cabrillo log and tell Writelog to email it. The email comes up and I hit Send.
/archives//html/WriteLog/2010-12/msg00030.html (9,317 bytes)

11. Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo output (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin <jbastin@sssnet.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 06:43:37 -0500
Maybe because now the e-mail client software defaults to sending html or RTF, instead of plain text which it always was, in the past. The e-mail program designers think it's a feature, instead of the
/archives//html/WriteLog/2010-12/msg00031.html (9,519 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu