Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Correctly\s+Recording\s+Splits\s+w\/v10\.19a\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Correctly\s+Recording\s+Splits\s+w\/v10\.19a\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Correctly Recording Splits w/v10.19a (score: 1): Author: wd3q@erols.com (Eric Rosenberg); Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 21:08:44 -0500; I just finished using version 10.19a in the CQWW contest. All went well, and I was pleased. What I did notice is that some of the (few) QSO's that I made using split frequencies were incorrectly logg; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00340.html (8,530 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Correctly Recording Splits w/v10.19a (score: 1): Author: k5zd@ma.ultranet.com (Randy Thompson, K5ZD); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 02:48:39 -0000; There are two answers to your question. 1. For the contest log. The CQ WW Committee only cares that the band is logged correctly. They do not look at the frequencies during the checking process. 2. F; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00342.html (10,253 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Correctly Recording Splits w/v10.19a (score: 1): Author: wd3q@erols.com (Eric Rosenberg); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 07:27:51 -0500; Randy, thanks...I can breathe a bit better now! Is there a solution, or rather, is a need for one? For you guys who run high rates (I'm a very little pistol, believe me), it could be trouble... ...wh; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00353.html (10,017 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]