Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+DXTelnet\s+\-\s+Outgoing\s+Spots\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+DXTelnet\s+\-\s+Outgoing\s+Spots\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] DXTelnet - Outgoing Spots (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:30:07 -0500; I'd appreciate hearing from anyone else using DXTelnet with 10.36 if they experienced an inability to send outgoing spots? Tnx/73, Barry N1EU www.albany.net/~bg ______________________________________; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00415.html (7,521 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] DXTelnet - Outgoing Spots (score: 1): Author: cwman@juno.com (cwman@juno.com); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:27:41 GMT; Using 10.33 here and I noticed at least once that a spot I sent did not appear in the bandmap or mult window and I needed the country so it should have appeared. 73, Fred/NA2U CWMAN...I'D RATHER WORK; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00416.html (8,453 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] DXTelnet - Outgoing Spots (score: 1): Author: George Johnson" <w1zt@arrl.net (George Johnson); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:42:19 -0500; Yes, I had some "trouble". I did not try to diagnose it during the contest but it looked like either DXTelnet, or the node were clogged and spots were stopped going out from WL as well DXtelnet stopp; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00417.html (8,904 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] DXTelnet - Outgoing Spots (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:48:52 -0500; Is there a preferred order for starting up WriteLog versus DXTelnet? I've had difficulty a few times in the past at getting the spots that I was seeing in DXT to flow into WL, and managed to fix it b; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00418.html (7,685 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] DXTelnet - Outgoing Spots (score: 1): Author: George Johnson" <w1zt@arrl.net (George Johnson); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:37:54 -0500; I believe starting UDPsend then starting WL is reliable. I have then either started DXTelnet (which seems to find UDPsend) or started WL (which also seems to find UDPsend). Sometimes I have had to re; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00419.html (8,568 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] DXTelnet - Outgoing Spots (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:50:03 -0500; You guys that are having some trouble might try setting up DXT and WL without using UDP per www.qsl.net/wa9als/dxtelnet.htm and see if that solves it for you. I haven't had any problems, but I'm not; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00420.html (8,116 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] DXTelnet - Outgoing Spots (score: 1): Author: llindblom@juno.com (Larry L Lindblom); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:00:44 +0000; I wonder how much of the problem with spots not showing us is due to cluster overload during the contest. Talking to one of the sys ops of a local cluster might be insightful. When using packet (I se; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00435.html (10,098 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] DXTelnet - Outgoing Spots (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:19:41 -0500; Yikes, guess I was asleep at the wheel. What I thought was a DXTelnet issue is a fundamental problem with 10.36 as Barry (W2UP) was indicating all along here. I went back and disabled the DXTelnet ob; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00436.html (9,009 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]