Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Dupes\s+still\s+report\s+to\s+Cabrillo\s+file\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Dupes\s+still\s+report\s+to\s+Cabrillo\s+file\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Dupes still report to Cabrillo file (score: 1): Author: n4sl@yahoo.com (Steve L.); Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:38:06 -0700 (PDT); Hello, Dupes I work that are marked with the red 'D' before the callsign are still reported in my Cabrillo file, even if I mark them as 'Unclaimed'. They DON'T report to the summary sheet generated,; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00251.html (7,245 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Dupes still report to Cabrillo file (score: 1): Author: WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@1umc.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 13:59:17 -0500; It's supposed to work that way. The log checkers handle those dupes just fine. It always surprises people the first time, but it's OK. If the dupes are there and the other guy claims the 2nd QSO that; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00252.html (8,458 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Dupes still report to Cabrillo file (score: 1): Author: k4jrb@juno.com (Dave L Thompson); Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 15:10:49 -0400; Steve, The whole idea of cabrillo which the ARRL developed with Trey N5KO was to include dupes. They are clearly marked with red and a D and score as dupes with no points or penalty. The plus is if t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00253.html (7,775 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]