Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+FT1000MKV\s+Sound\s+Card\s+Interface\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+FT1000MKV\s+Sound\s+Card\s+Interface\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] FT1000MKV Sound Card Interface (score: 1): Author: kd0s@pie.midco.net (Jim Zahradnicek); Date: Fri Apr 18 16:44:32 2003; I couldnt find anything in the archives on this, but I just upgraded to the MKV and want to know what others are using for AFSK interface. In my searches, I see some are using the Patch phone jack fo; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-04/msg00114.html (7,000 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] FT1000MKV Sound Card Interface (score: 1): Author: doncassel@compuserve.com (Don Cassel); Date: Fri Apr 18 17:48:56 2003; Jim, I have used the Packet jack successfully on the Mark V. It also gives you more filtering than the mic jack. I have used a homebrew interface but lately am using RigBlaster Plus. A diagram of my; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-04/msg00115.html (8,292 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] FT1000MKV Sound Card Interface (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Fri Apr 18 18:14:10 2003; Yes, the PACKET DIN is the best place for AFSK input. Some people have used the PATCH input because VOX is active for this, whereas it is not for the PACKET input. However, the PACKET input does hav; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-04/msg00116.html (7,414 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]