- 1. [WriteLog] General logging (score: 1)
- Author: DBellW6AQ@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 15:14:38 EDT
- I'd like to use Writelog for everyday QSO logging. Anybody doing it? If no general log possible, how about a contest that will sort of double for a simple general log? Thanks and 73, Dave, W6AQ _____
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-04/msg00074.html (6,304 bytes)
- 2. RE: [WriteLog] General logging (score: 1)
- Author: "Sherman Banks" <w4atl@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 17:09:08 -0400
- Just use it in DXpedition mode. _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog WriteLog on the web
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-04/msg00075.html (7,428 bytes)
- 3. Re: [WriteLog] General logging (score: 1)
- Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 17:58:24 EDT
- Hello Dave, I use WL for my everyday logging using the DXpedition module. I have been doing this since I went to WL in 2000. The DXpedition module only allows for a minimal amount of information, but
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-04/msg00077.html (7,435 bytes)
- 4. Re: [WriteLog] General logging (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Pixton <jpixton@shentel.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:13:19 +0000
- Dave, I use the DXCC contest. Run one log for each month. Then import into my database program. I see that it is now called - General DXCC tracking log keeper. Jerry, W6IHG At 03:14 PM 4/9/2004 -0400
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-04/msg00083.html (8,338 bytes)
- 5. Re: [WriteLog] General logging (score: 1)
- Author: Rick Tavan <tavan@tibco.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 22:45:59 -0700
- I tried the DXpedition mode and found the paucity of data entry fields unacceptable for general QSOs, so I defined my own general logging format with more and longer fields. They don't all quite fit
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-04/msg00139.html (8,728 bytes)
- 6. Re: [WriteLog] General logging (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Pixton <jpixton@shentel.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 11:19:23 +0000
- Rick, Gee. Just a counterpoint. I have used Writelog's format for at least three years for general qso logging and dxing on HF and I have a Satellite log that has Grid and Satellite fields. All have
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-04/msg00140.html (10,353 bytes)
- 7. Re: [WriteLog] General logging (score: 1)
- Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 09:03:56 EDT
- You hit the nail on the log! Setting up a log line is something I futzed around with a few years ago and gave up in disgust. There must be an easier way. I do use WL for general logging, but my needs
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-04/msg00141.html (7,901 bytes)
- 8. Re: [WriteLog] General logging (score: 1)
- Author: Dave L Thompson <k4jrb@juno.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:55:41 -0400
- George, Your 2004 CQ 160 CW log that shows a claimed score of 151K is missing from my master file. If you have a log please send it to 160cw@kkn.net and if any problems let me know. 73 Dave K4JRB CQ
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-04/msg00142.html (7,766 bytes)
- 9. Re: [WriteLog] General logging (score: 1)
- Author: "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:00:21 +0100
- Jerry Pixton wrote: the upside is I am using the same software that I want to use for contesting. And that is a very *big* upside, because the best training software for WriteLog is... WriteLog! By u
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-04/msg00145.html (9,895 bytes)
- 10. Re: [WriteLog] General logging (score: 1)
- Author: "Donald Eriksen" <don.wsixffh@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:44:25 -0700
- I agree with Jerry and Ian is right, to be a useable daily logging program, WL would have to be selectable per mode. Rather than asking Wayne to do anything to make WL a daily general logging program
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-04/msg00146.html (11,756 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu