Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Icom\s+ICOM\s+CT\-17\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Icom ICOM CT-17 (score: 1)
Author: "John Hoaglun" <john@hoaglun.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:35:04 -0600
I currently own an Icom 756 and I am in the process of acquiring an Icom 746. Currently I use an Icom CT-17 multi port interface with my 756 which works fine with Writelog. Can I use my currently CT-
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00259.html (7,077 bytes)

2. RE: [WriteLog] Icom ICOM CT-17 (score: 1)
Author: "Nick Kail" <m3mlr@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 07:19:17 -0000
All you need to change on your 746 is the CI-V address to make sure it isn't the same as your 756 73's Nick 2E0MLR I currently own an Icom 756 and I am in the process of acquiring an Icom 746. Curren
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00264.html (8,170 bytes)

3. RE: [WriteLog] Icom ICOM CT-17 (score: 1)
Author: George Johnson <w1zt@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 06:03:30 -0500
Nick, John, While the CT-17 will support multiple radios with a different CI-V address, I do not believe Writelog will support issuing commands on the same Com port with the different CI-V addresses.
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00265.html (9,896 bytes)

4. RE: [WriteLog] Icom ICOM CT-17 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 05:53:19 -0600
George, This has come up in another forum recently. What was suggested as one possibility would be to set up another com port in the WriteLog.INI file to have the same addresses and IRQ as the one wh
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00266.html (11,185 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu